Allen Downey (author of the above) has a number of books on computer science-y things. You can buy hardcopies but I think all of them are also just freely available.
BTW, if Allen Downey is reads this, I just want to send some love. I saw the beginning of the Internet. Everybody was full of dreams of the free flow of information and shareable knowledge, which greatest representation was executable code. Now, when we are surrounded by walled gardens and evil billionaires, Allen is always sharing his knowledge for all the world. Thank you.
nosioptar 31 days ago [-]
Seconded, not only is Downey quite generous, his books are every bit as good, if not better, than expensive counterparts. Think Stats bailed my ass out of failing a stats class because it was so much clearer than the assigned book.
guiambros 31 days ago [-]
Also:
- Think Python
- Think Data Structures
- Think Java
- Think Perl6 (!)
- Modeling and Simulation in Python
- Probably Overthinking It
And more [1]. He's a prolific writer, and very generous for offering many of them for free. I read several of them online or through O'Reilly, and bought printed copies just to appreciate his work. Really enjoyed Think DSP, Think Complexity, Think Bayes, etc.
Matrix multiplication introduced before vector addition... the "Linear Algebra Done Right" in me is screaming inside.
That being said, it is definitely cool to have a Jupyter-notebook based set of examples of practical linear algebra
rahimnathwani 31 days ago [-]
This is a deliberate pedagogical choice, and one which will familiar to those who did one of Jeremy Howard's deep learning courses.
One of the challenges of learning Linear Algebra is where to start. Most textbooks start with vector arithmetic, which make senses if you are working with paper and pencil, but they take a long time to get to something useful.
With a computational approach, we have the option to proceed top-down -- that is, we can start with libraries that implement the core algorithms of linear algebra, and wait until later to see how they work. With this approach we can can get to the good stuff faster.
bsoles 31 days ago [-]
And eigenvectors in the first lesson!
finghin 31 days ago [-]
I think at the beginning of learning LA I would have benefited from a more broad introduction to the topic by explaining that it is the algebra of transformations, generally linear transformations, and also the art of quantifying those transformations in meaningful ways.
I would have benefited from some more handwaving in this regard (matrix multiplication, eigenvectors and eigenvalues) and less on the mechanics of the operations, before starting on the basic technicalities. But a “lesson” on these topics on day 0 is too soon
31 days ago [-]
krackers 31 days ago [-]
Vector addition is just matrix multiplication in a homogeneous coordinate system, what's the problem?
Pay08 31 days ago [-]
"The Fibonacci sequence is just addition of specific numbers, what's the problem?"
krackers 30 days ago [-]
Funnily enough Fibonacci sequence is also matrix multiplication
victor106 31 days ago [-]
What would you suggest as a complimentary resource to this?
This is a great book but and as the author himself notes, it's not an ideal first linear algebra book.
Strang can be great as a first book. He focuses more on what rather than why, so if one wants to delve deeper, it needs to be supplemented by a few other books.
mamonster 30 days ago [-]
I still don't get why Axler decided to discuss the Jordan normal form after already doing the spectral theorem, it's a bit like presenting Riemannian integration after Lebesgue.
For the long term his emphasis on operators is probably better as naturally transitions into functional analysis, but you can get a lot of stuff done without ever touching them.
KalMann 30 days ago [-]
Did you misstate your comment? The Jordan normal form is more general than spectral decomposition so it should come after.
mamonster 30 days ago [-]
I'm open to being corrected, but AFAIK the normal form (1870) precedes the official focus on operators (with Hilbert) by like 20-30 years.
srean 29 days ago [-]
KalMann is correct. Jordan canonical form decomposition is more general. Every matrix in an algebraically closed field will have such a decomposition. This is not true for spectral decomposition. Only diagonalizable matrices will have a spectral decomposition and they are a smaller subset.
That said, Jordan form is uglier than spectral decomposition, to my taste that is. Spectral decomposition so beautiful and neat.
Beyond regression, I’d like to see chapters on statistical topics like PCA, CCA. This textbook format which interleaves code and prose is the perfect way to show how scikitlearn’s decomposition.cca and decomposition.pca are implemented, e.g. the SVD matrix decomposition, etc.
I saw a linear algebra “textbook” on Twitter in maybe 2022? It was black background and bright text with a good amount of graphs like someone’s incredibly long blog post. I’ve tried a few times to find it since but haven’t had any luck.
This looks a bit more involved but lovely I think I’ll try it. I read Think Bayes and thought it was great.
rahimnathwani 31 days ago [-]
'Coding the matrix' has a black cover with white/bright text.
immanuwell 31 days ago [-]
Downey's "Think X" series is consistently the on-ramp for people who learned to code before they learned the math, and honestly at this point everything is linear algebra
vidro3 31 days ago [-]
what's the deal with the loop example? am i supposed to understand what this represents before going through the material?
kevinwang 30 days ago [-]
Where's chapter 3?
fnord77 31 days ago [-]
I got my hands on a stanford Math 55 textbook and tried to do the exercises in numpy.
persep 19 days ago [-]
Can you tell us the name of it?
fnord77 17 days ago [-]
Sorry, I meant Math 51
It's title is:
"Linear Algebra, Multivariable Calculus,
and Modern Applications, Math 51 course text prepared by the
Stanford University Math Department"
31 days ago [-]
The_Blade 31 days ago [-]
Linear Algebra is dope, as in when we got to apply some mid-level linear to a real business problem and it worked i got high
deadbishop 31 days ago [-]
What was the problem you solved?
bonsai_spool 31 days ago [-]
What was the business problem, broadly? How did you apply linear algebra to it?
Rendered at 20:46:32 GMT+0000 (UTC) with Wasmer Edge.
Here's a few:
Think Complexity
https://github.com/AllenDowney/ThinkComplexity2
Think DSP
https://github.com/AllenDowney/ThinkDSP
Think Stats
https://github.com/AllenDowney/ThinkStats/
Think Bayes
https://github.com/AllenDowney/ThinkBayes2/
- Think Python
- Think Data Structures
- Think Java
- Think Perl6 (!)
- Modeling and Simulation in Python
- Probably Overthinking It
And more [1]. He's a prolific writer, and very generous for offering many of them for free. I read several of them online or through O'Reilly, and bought printed copies just to appreciate his work. Really enjoyed Think DSP, Think Complexity, Think Bayes, etc.
[1] https://www.amazon.com/stores/Allen-Downey/author/B001O8NBPS
Many places on the web. Runestone is probably the most useful like but I’ll leave my favorite classic one below.
http://www.openbookproject.net/thinkcs/python/english3e/
I'm pretty sure there are also some forks where people adapted the book to other languages than Java or Python.
https://allendowney.github.io/ThinkPython/
That being said, it is definitely cool to have a Jupyter-notebook based set of examples of practical linear algebra
I would have benefited from some more handwaving in this regard (matrix multiplication, eigenvectors and eigenvalues) and less on the mechanics of the operations, before starting on the basic technicalities. But a “lesson” on these topics on day 0 is too soon
https://linear.axler.net/
Strang can be great as a first book. He focuses more on what rather than why, so if one wants to delve deeper, it needs to be supplemented by a few other books.
For the long term his emphasis on operators is probably better as naturally transitions into functional analysis, but you can get a lot of stuff done without ever touching them.
That said, Jordan form is uglier than spectral decomposition, to my taste that is. Spectral decomposition so beautiful and neat.
https://www.t3x.org/klong/
Quick ref:
https://www.t3x.org/klong/klong-qref.txt.html
Intro:
https://www.t3x.org/klong/klong-intro.txt.html
Klong for K users:
https://www.t3x.org/klong/klong-vs-k.txt.html
This looks a bit more involved but lovely I think I’ll try it. I read Think Bayes and thought it was great.
It's title is:
"Linear Algebra, Multivariable Calculus, and Modern Applications, Math 51 course text prepared by the Stanford University Math Department"