Claude code written for basic on your Apple II, because it'd be so retro.
rpst 55 minutes ago [-]
I'd love to see it
eszed 5 hours ago [-]
How much of this was written using / by Claude? Not hating or snarking, BTW, just curious.
Why (especially if the answer above is 'yes' / 'most') do we collectively think Anthropic built such a heavy interface?
rpst 4 hours ago [-]
all of it, and I think the answer is
1. feature creep
2. a lot of nice-to-haves. the TUI alone is responsible for a lot of bloat
malicka 3 hours ago [-]
That sure is a lot of lines to avoid using getopts...
0xa2 8 hours ago [-]
I'd say websearch and webfetch tools are very important but missing here. Great direction though, I also wonder about how much bloat could be eliminated...
rpst 4 hours ago [-]
agree, I was more focused on bloat than pure utility
theidioticdev 9 hours ago [-]
ok this is actually impressive, really.
idk why no one commented yet
Imustaskforhelp 6 hours ago [-]
I am now waiting for, Claude Code rewritten in assembly project :)
(Maybe it can be a good project for anyone who works low-level)
rpst 4 hours ago [-]
we’re going to have a bunch of CC rewritten in <obscure language>
kridsdale1 3 hours ago [-]
Waiting for Rust.
Imustaskforhelp 3 hours ago [-]
Claw-code (reached 100k stars on github and I have made an article about them[0]) are currently re-writing claude-code in rust (they have already ported it to python)
Why (especially if the answer above is 'yes' / 'most') do we collectively think Anthropic built such a heavy interface?
(Maybe it can be a good project for anyone who works low-level)
Its worth following: https://github.com/instructkr/claw-code
[0]: my article: https://smileplease.mataroa.blog/blog/claw-code-reaches-100k...